Read with me!

ReadWithME

 

When a giant angry turnip was elected president of the United States last year, I started to feel a little down. Naturally my response was to buy an unabridged copy of Robert Burton’s The Anatomy of Melancholy. My get-out-of-bed-without-crying-plan is to read a little piece of this gargantuan lump of knowledge daily, and I will illustrate it as I go. I started www.masterofliterature.com to share my pictures and, I hope, coerce others into reading along with me. Whoops, of course I mean convince. It is so easy to confuse those two. Convince! That’s what I meant.

When someone asks you to read The Anatomy of Melancholy, you may find that you have questions. Let me answer them here.

 

So, Devon, you want me to read the complete, unabridged Anatomy of Melancholy with you? How long is it?

Well, if you don’t include the notes, which are in Latin anyhow, it’s only 1,132 pages! It’s a real page turner too, I promise, such a quick read really. (Why the motherloving heck didn’t the publisher translate the Latin notes in my edition? Did they just assume that anyone buying the complete Anatomy of Melancholy would be some nutjob who speaks Latin in the 21st century? That was probably a safe assumption.)

 

Okay… But what is it?

It is a seventeenth century medical treatise written by Robert Burton, an Oxford fellow and vicar, who more or less lived out his life in various libraries reading and writing this thing. Apparently, if he was feeling down, he also enjoyed hanging around Folly Bridge to listen to the boatmen shout obscenities at each other. The Anatomy of Melancholy is his chief work. The only other thing he wrote was a satirical play for a student production, Philosophaster. The Anatomy quickly went off the rails, and it more or less became just a massive… great work o’ literature. It is hard to sum up a 1200 page book in one sentence, but you could say it is about being a thinking, decent person cursed to live on a planet filled with idiot tyrannosauruses that have been destroying everything good for thousands of years. Know the feeling? It sucks, hence the melancholy. 

 

How long will this take?

Under a year, probably. When I was in grad school I could read 500 pages a day, but only if I did literally nothing else all day except eat donuts and watch one episode of X-Files before bed. At that rate it would only take three days. However, given my current lifestyle in which I parent two small goblins, my speed has more realistically slowed to about three to four pages a day, which works out to about ten months to finish. My goal is to finish by the end of 2017. After that, I am planning to keep this bloggity blog going with a new book for the new year. I will just keep on soothing the big ol’ WTF in my brain until the loud potato growing a peculiar orange mold on the top of his head is out of office. Perhaps your brain is in need of this too.

 

Will 1,132 pages of writing on melancholy make me feel… melancholic?

If you aren’t already feeling melancholic then there is something wrong with you. Also, oh my goodness no! It is truly an uplifting book, though heavy to lift near one’s face while reading. And hey, my own two cents would be that melancholia is not a bad thing. To be thoughtful, awake, and alive – without living in complete denial of everything bad (chiefly death but also other seriously bad stuff like racism, genocide, and all the evils humans to do one another) – is to be melancholic. It is the best way to live, but it is not the easiest. As an important aside, it has been a bit trendy in the past couple of decades to say that melancholia is just an old-fashioned term for depression. Oh ho! Look at that! Depression existed in the seventeenth century! Gasp! I would argue that clinical depression is actually very different than what we are dealing with in The Anatomy of Melancholy. They certainly do overlap, but if you have a chemical malfunction in your brain (that is, at last, thankfully, manageable with modern medicine – hooray modern medicine!) that is a very different thing than viewing the profoundly bad State of the World with a contradictorily pleasurable moroseness.

 

Why are you doing this to yourself?

Well, when a vulgar, incoherent atomic tangerine was elected as our president last year, I started feeling pretty down. So did most of my friends. I think reading the Anatomy of Melancholy might make us all feel a little better, and it will definitely make us all a little smarter.

 

But… but… how does reading a nearly four hundred year old book HELP ANYTHING AT ALL? Shouldn’t you be marching, calling your congressperson, etc.?

Please stop yelling, and yes, I should be and I am. But I really believe that the less tangible thing that we have to work on is the very angry tidal wave of anti-intellectualism that has finally crashed down on our country. So I guess I am trying to help with that in my own small and weird way. We all need to read and think more, much more. On top of all the immediate, material stuff that is in front of us, like calling our representatives about the ACA and the EPA and All That, we also need to enact a cultural shift that makes deep reflection cool again. Be smart, be thoughtful, be well read and informed, and don’t be a smug jerk about it either.

 

I still don’t want to read that book.

Darn. Well, if you don’t believe me, believe the critics! According to Boswell, Samuel Johnson once said that The Anatomy of Melancholy was “the only book that ever took him out of bed two hours sooner than he wished to rise.” Golly gee whittakers! Byron once wrote that reading The Anatomy of Melancholy was the best way “to acquire a reputation of being well read, with the least trouble.” See?! Only 1,132 pages and you’re officially “well read!” Romantic poets like Byron had an abundance of free time to read 1,132 page-long books because they weren’t always Snapchatting their friends on Facebook or whatever it is you people do nowadays. Also they mostly did not have jobs, but whatevs. Read. Consider it a daily workout for your brain. Or read my blog at least, please? After you call your congressperson, of course. It will make you feel better about things, I promise, because it will be mostly silly pictures.

 

It might be pretty unlikely I have convinced anyone, but if I have, I am reading the 2001 New York Review of Books Edition and will be using their numeration and effing Latin endnotes. Does Google translate do Latin?

If you prefer less matter to haul around, you can read The Anatomy online via Project Gutenberg: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10800.

The readalong is now underway, but if you are joining in now, begin at the beginning. Or check out the story so far.

Addendum, June 2017: I am experiencing slowed summer progress… 50% due to having both kids home full time, and 50% due to the book being even more incredible than I anticipated, necessitating numerous drawings per page at times. All of which is to say: If you only just found me, this is a good time to join in, and you can easily catch up! I don’t expect to finish by the end of 2017, more like mid-2018 or later.

7 Comments

  1. Google translate does do Latin (not very well). Gibbon has footnotes in Latin and Greek (at least in my edition) so it could be worse 🙂
    -Margaret

    Like

    1. Wow, good for Google! If anyone – or any massive corporation – is going to help keep a dead language alive, it would have to be Google. I wonder how many Google employees speak Latin… Does Google employ Classics PhD’s? I am totally going to copy and paste my notes and see what fun nonsense comes out. Thanks!

      Like

  2. Well, I started – I think that reading AofM on kindle isn’t a smart idea, and I will check out the edition you’re using. So far, I’ve read, like, eight kindle pages, and stumbled on a bunch of words. Looked up “cento,” which was a new one on me. Anyway, with kindle, it’s hard to “look around,” which is part of the fun.

    Like

    1. I generally like to have a real book in front of me. Otherwise it doesn’t feel like “real” reading somehow. I know the a Kindle is easier to read for many though, because it is easier on the eyes. And for this particular tome, I could understand using Kindle purely for practical reasons, ha. It is literally heavy reading.
      But I like to underline and write all over my books, and you can’t do that on a Kindle last I checked. So I won’t be getting one anytime soon. Like I literally cannot read a book without a pencil in my hand. Even with light reading that I’m not marking up, I compulsively reach for a pencil.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s